Skip to content
Directory/Categories/Security/MagekwikScanner
MA

MagekwikScanner

GoodBotVerifiedBOT

Passive security and PCI-exposure audit for Magento 2 and Adobe Commerce storefronts. GET/HEAD only, user-initiated.

GoodBot
Assessment
Security
Category
BOT
Kind
1
Data sources

Identification

Bot name
MagekwikScanner
Category
Security
Kind
BOT
Verification
Verified bot
Cloudflare slug
magekwikscanner
User-agent string
MagekwikScanner/1.0 (+https://scan.magekwik.com; passive security audit)
Rated Oct 23, 2026 from public evidence

How we rated this bot

Verified by Cloudflare, which confirms who runs it, with no widespread reports of abuse.

Names itself honestly
Yes
Verified by Cloudflare
Yes
Says it follows robots.txt and opt-outs
Not stated
Ignores site rules
None found
Disguises itself or evades blocks
None found
Overloads sites
None found
How widely people complain
No complaint about this bot in the evidence
Reddit discussion
There is no Reddit discussion of this bot in the evidence

What we read

Block or allow MagekwikScanner

Block it

Add a Disallow rule for MagekwikScanner/1.0 (+https://scan.magekwik.com; passive security audit) in your robots.txt file. You can also block at the server level using your web server configuration or CDN firewall rules to filter requests matching the user-agent string.

# Block MagekwikScanner from crawling your entire site
User-agent: MagekwikScanner/1.0 (+https://scan.magekwik.com; passive security audit)
Disallow: /

# Allow MagekwikScanner full access
User-agent: MagekwikScanner/1.0 (+https://scan.magekwik.com; passive security audit)
Allow: /
Allow & verify

Ensure your robots.txt allows MagekwikScanner/1.0 (+https://scan.magekwik.com; passive security audit). Verify requests by checking the user-agent string.

Traffic & trends

Cloudflare Radar traffic

No Cloudflare traffic data available.

Google Trends interest

Loading trend data…

Data sources

This profile is compiled from the following sources.

CloudflareRadar
Last updated October 25, 2026

Something wrong with this entry? Suggest a correction