PR
PrimafonteBot
GoodBotVerifiedAGENTUser-initiated scan of one URL. Reports if AI models can read and cite it. No continuous crawling. Obeys robots.txt.
Identification
Bot name
PrimafonteBot
Category
AI Assistant
Kind
AGENT
Verification
Verified bot
Cloudflare slug
primafontebot
Rated Oct 22, 2026 from public evidence
How we rated this bot
Verified by Cloudflare, which confirms who runs it, with no widespread reports of abuse.
Names itself honestly
Yes
Verified by Cloudflare
Yes
Says it follows robots.txt and opt-outs
Yes
Ignores site rules
None found
Disguises itself or evades blocks
None found
Overloads sites
None found
How widely people complain
No complaint about this bot in the evidence
Reddit discussion
There is no Reddit discussion of this bot in the evidence
What we read
- google ignoring robots.txt ? - Google Search Central Community
- I wonder if it will actually respect the robots.txt this time. | Hacker News
- GPTBot ignoring robots.txt and hammering single URL in a loop — potential infinite crawl bug - Community - OpenAI Developer Community
- How to deal with AI crawlers that ignore robots.txt | Soups Ranjan posted on the topic | LinkedIn
- Meta Has New Web-Crawling Bots That Sneakily Get Around Robots.txt - Business Insider
Block or allow PrimafonteBot
Block it
Add a Disallow rule for PrimafonteBot in your robots.txt file. You can also block at the server level using your web server configuration or CDN firewall rules to filter requests matching the user-agent string.
# Block PrimafonteBot from crawling your entire site User-agent: PrimafonteBot Disallow: / # Allow PrimafonteBot full access User-agent: PrimafonteBot Allow: /
Allow & verify
Ensure your robots.txt allows PrimafonteBot. Verify requests by checking the user-agent string.
Traffic & trends
Cloudflare Radar traffic
No Cloudflare traffic data available.
Google Trends interest
Loading trend data…
Links & references
Data sources
This profile is compiled from the following sources.
CloudflareRadar
Last updated October 25, 2026
Something wrong with this entry? Suggest a correction