Skip to content
UP

UptimeObserver Bot

GoodBotVerifiedBOT

UptimeObserver checks website and service availability, reporting downtime and performance issues.

GoodBot
Assessment
Monitoring & Analytics
Category
BOT
Kind
1
Data sources

Identification

Bot name
UptimeObserver Bot
Category
Monitoring & Analytics
Kind
BOT
Verification
Verified bot
Cloudflare slug
uptimeobserver-bot
User-agent string
Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; UptimeObserver/1.0; +http://uptimeobserver.com/)
Rated Oct 9, 2026 from public evidence

How we rated this bot

Verified by Cloudflare, which confirms who runs it, with no widespread reports of abuse.

Names itself honestly
Yes
Verified by Cloudflare
Yes
Says it follows robots.txt and opt-outs
Not stated
Ignores site rules
None found
Disguises itself or evades blocks
None found
Overloads sites
None found
How widely people complain
No complaint about this bot in the evidence
Reddit discussion
There is no Reddit discussion of this bot in the evidence

What we read

Block or allow UptimeObserver Bot

Block it

Add a Disallow rule for Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; UptimeObserver/1.0; +http://uptimeobserver.com/) in your robots.txt file. You can also block at the server level using your web server configuration or CDN firewall rules to filter requests matching the user-agent string.

# Block UptimeObserver Bot from crawling your entire site
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; UptimeObserver/1.0; +http://uptimeobserver.com/)
Disallow: /

# Allow UptimeObserver Bot full access
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; UptimeObserver/1.0; +http://uptimeobserver.com/)
Allow: /
Allow & verify

Ensure your robots.txt allows Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; UptimeObserver/1.0; +http://uptimeobserver.com/). Verify requests by checking the user-agent string.

Traffic & trends

Cloudflare Radar traffic

No Cloudflare traffic data available.

Google Trends interest

Loading trend data…

Data sources

This profile is compiled from the following sources.

CloudflareRadar
Last updated October 9, 2026

Something wrong with this entry? Suggest a correction